![]() ![]() In his letter, Justice McReynolds said nothing about Justice Brandeis.Ī Taft biographer, Alpheus T. The justices had sat for a portrait in 1923, and no new justice had been appointed since then. ![]() The misunderstanding arose from a 1924 letter from Justice McReynolds, who told Chief Justice William Howard Taft that “I absolutely refuse to go through the bore of picture taking until there is a change in the court” - meaning the arrival of a new justice. Justice McReynolds was indeed an anti-Semite and racist, but that particular story was false, as Mr. McReynolds, an anti-Semite and a racist, refused to sit next to Justice Louis D. “The court had to cancel its portrait that year,” I wrote in a 2010 column, “because Justice James C. It has long been said, including by me, that the court did not sit for a 1924 group photograph for an ugly reason. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |